Thе people аt thoughtbubble.org used thе audio οf a video I mаdе tο сrеаtе thіѕ аmаzіng Thουght Bubble. SUBSCRIBE TO THEM аt www.youtube.com
Video Rating: 4 / 5
, | 
Healthcare Job News | 
RSS feed
Comments and pings are currently closed.
January 4, 2011 at 12:32 am
@ThePedub No. You don’t tear them up, you turn them over to state governments.
January 4, 2011 at 1:09 am
Meet a Russian bride gettop5.info
January 4, 2011 at 1:27 am
@ThePedub u wann bet? tin the constitution the federal government has the right to regulate trade between the states. by setting up highways thats what there doing. so what you said is wrong come back to me if you wanna try it again
January 4, 2011 at 2:24 am
@skatelongboards There are lots of things not in the constitution. Nowhere in the constitution does it say that we should have a national highway system, so should we tear up the highways?
January 4, 2011 at 3:07 am
@skatelongboards Most of what the gov does is unconstitutional my friend. If we reform the gov and start operating it like a business and cut waste and fire all the lazy ppl it would function health care fine. The reason why gov health care is broke is because they only take out 3% of each dollar for overhead costs while private company’s take out 15-30%. I firmly believe company’s shouldn’t profit off ppls lives bc they start abusing there power to make more money like denying coverage.
January 4, 2011 at 4:04 am
@kinglbkiv heres the thing national healthcare is illegal……NOWHERE in the constitution does it say the federal government can do healthcare. now i would support a STATEWIDE healthcare but not a national one cause this is your life and health. do we really want to give the feds that much power over us. best if we keep it local or statewide so if it fails it will only effect 1 state not the whole country.
Keep feds out of healthcare!support a statewide healthcare for your state!
January 4, 2011 at 4:36 am
ahah , america don’t like socialism ,yet they vote they go in public waterclosets , they support their troops and the war industry , they like their police , isn’t that socialist
but when it’s something like paying for others to get healthy , that’s no way
Look, my country actually have health care and I never heard somebody complaining about it (the rich can pay their own care in a private doctor)
They even wonder how “the so called best country in the world” is so late for that …
January 4, 2011 at 5:12 am
@shmuli9 Not fully correct. You get the actual healthcare for free. However if you want extras, you can pay for them.
January 4, 2011 at 6:09 am
This debate is so simple i cant fathom why some are against gov run health care. If you run the gov like a business and cut waste and fire all the lazy bums it would be more efficient. Why would you put your life in the hands of corporations who’s only intensive is to maximize profits versus lowering cost and providing coverage. They get billions for providing no service when that money should be going back into the system
January 4, 2011 at 6:45 am
Airport security is now performing free medical screening with advanced technology. You may also opt for a free colonoscopy .
January 4, 2011 at 7:14 am
@aminizle
I am 25. But anyway, the point is that people below 25 are people with rights too (so many people forget this?). If a young person deems it unnecessary to have insurance (or anyone for that matter if they so choose) and subsequently subsidize an aging, unhealthy population, company, or community – it’s really their right. Insurance is expensive. Some people don’t have the cash/are against it ideally, and are willing to take risks… it’s kind of an American thing to do.
January 4, 2011 at 7:51 am
@TheDancingRadio
it’s capitAl, broski
But anyway! Where did i say anyone has the right to be treated in a hospital?
Would I personally turn someone down if it were my hospital? No, as a matter of fact I’d probably have a policy which opens care to all. However, in this scenario forcing me to treat someone just straight up takes my personal rights away. I’m simply not obligated to. Sure everyone should aspire to be a “good Samaritan”, but we aren’t constitutionally obligated to, you know?
January 4, 2011 at 8:34 am
a right? what about my right to own a fancy sports car biatch?!
January 4, 2011 at 9:30 am
If virtually every other “advanced” country (and many not-so-advanced countries) didn’t have some form of guaranteed health care, OR if medical treatment weren’t so expensive in the US (people without insurance routinely used to have babies in hospital – and the whole stay cost maybe $500, as opposed to $20,000 or more today), I wouldn’t think it was necessary, but if EVERY country except “these United States” has comprehensive health, why isn’t there such a thing here?
January 4, 2011 at 9:49 am
In England, AND Canada, there is still a VERY healthy “private insurance” industry. The only thing that this health care “reform” will do is ensure a BASIC level of health care availibilty to everyone. (In the UK, if you ONLY have “the National Health”, it means that if you are in hospital, you most likely will be in a ward and won’t have – gasp – a private TV, but almost ALL jobs in the UK offer “perks” in the form of private hospital rooms, TVs and telephones.)
January 4, 2011 at 9:52 am
@mds1303 So in other words aside from there most likely will still be a private sector your saying they are not good enough to compete with free healthcare?
January 4, 2011 at 10:10 am
@Dasmaster1
the pricate sector you speak of will not exist because they can’t compete with the governement
January 4, 2011 at 10:41 am
@wildbloodydragon You havent been following U.S. politics for the past 2 years have you…
January 4, 2011 at 11:26 am
@mds1303 Nothing is ever black and white and you do have valid arguments for your position and i would be a fool to deny that.
However just because Healthcare is trash right now does not mean we should not strive to improve it. And a major part of that is believe it or not making it available for all.
I for one trust that we as a country actually can manage that without to much trouble in the end. Of-course there will always be private sectors that your completely free to go to for a fee.
January 4, 2011 at 12:20 pm
@bamaedgecore From the looks of things you don’t. Since when did non-profit become charity?
The government does not currently offer it’s own health insurance. The government does help start, fund and run many non-profit organizations. You must be living in a different realm to not know these things.
How about I stay and stick a dick in your mouth? I’d prefer that.
January 4, 2011 at 12:41 pm
@Dasmaster1
i don’t know if you are arguing for or against my point?
our system is the same if we changed to a socialzed system there is no way we could handle the strain and yes wait times go up and quality of care goes down…
not to mention when you have the money coming from government funding they simply have to decide who is in the most need, aka rationing care…..and i feel if i work hard and take care of my body i should have the ability to determine what treatments i need
January 4, 2011 at 1:16 pm
@wildbloodydragon (The government does not control non-profit organizations or charities).
I know, I own a non-profit booking company.
Tiny mind?
Do you know what non-profit and charity are?
NOW you pay the government to insure you less, but you get less, everyone has to pay, and away go private companies. It kills people and jobs, and likewise I will not pay for it.
Why dont you move to canada?
Or kill yourself…
January 4, 2011 at 1:52 pm
@mds1303 As far as im concerned Cuba has the best healthcare and no one else comes close. The major problem facing socialised healthcare is the lack of personnel.
Sure it might have been fine dealing with the majority of the people but when you drag in the rest in the system without considering the new strains wait times are inevitably.
However at the end of the day even the poors health is in your best interests because someone is going to have to scrape off the chewing gum off the walls.
January 4, 2011 at 2:27 pm
@bamaedgecore No sir, I’m saying you should your facts straight, stop blowing this out of proportions, and chill the fuck out.
A non-profit health insurance ran by the government is well within the means of our country right now.
In case your tiny mind cannot comprehend what non-profit and insurance mean: It means if you can’t afford health insurance, you pay the government to insure you for less. Simple as that.